HSTEU305 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
16TH C. WITCHCRAFT DEBATE: WEYER, BRENZ, SCOT, BODIN
Readings: Weyer,
Brenz & Bodin in Xerox Packet & Link from Course Web Page
plus
Kors & Peters selections: Bodin (#45, pp. 290-302)
Scot (# 60, pp.
394-401)
Johann Brenz, On Hailstorms
(1539)
According to this early Lutheran minister, what is the correct interpretation of hailstorms?
What is the popular interpretation he is arguing against?
How do ordinary
people respond to hailstorms?
What is Brenz’ position on state’s punishment of witches?
Weyer’s
reply to Brenz
What are the similarities and differences in their attitudes to witches?
What does Weyer
mean by “superstition” in letter to Brenz?
How would you
describe Weyer’s attitude towards the women/witches he defends?
Note the typically
Protestant argument between Weyer and Brenz over
interpretation of Scriptural passages.
Johann Weyer, On the
Illusions of Demons (1563)
Dedication to Duke of Cleves: note appeal for leniency
What is the origin of belief in witches?
Distinguish various types of arguments against witchcraft:
theological, philosophical, medical, legal
Weyer’s theory of melancholy
and Bodin’s reply:
Weyer's attack on theory of diabolical pact: note use of Canon Episcopi to make his point
Bodin, On the Demonomania
of Sorcerers (1580)
arguments against Weyer: medical (melancholy), legal,
arguments from authority & from experience
examples of Jeanne Harvillier, 1578
personal attack
on Weyer as sorcerer
Reginald Scot, Discovery
of Witchcraft (1584) : optional reading
refutation of Bodin and Malleus
( Kors &
Peters selections are in 16th C. English; try reading aloud.)
note types of arguments
used against witch beliefs:
common sense, empirical argument from cause & effect,
religious & legal arguments (issue of evidence)
attack on clergy
for fostering belief in witchcraft
discuss Scot’s
two definitions of witchcraft
as
1) “cousening art” (p. 399-400)
2)
blasphemy
use
of concrete examples: e.g p. 401